(It’s all a game, eh?) White takes pawn
Black takes bishop
Drone hits building
Everyone is killed
If Jesus had had a gun, they never would have been able to nail Him to the cross.
Then again . . . would He have refused to use it to defend Himself?
This is a gray area and things get a little confusing. Let’s face it, He became a real rock star as a result of the “turn the other cheek” sound bite. On the other hand, Jesus threw quite a temper tantrum and tossed the moneylenders out of the Temple __ physically tossed them out, from what I gather. It was His Steven Seagal moment.
Certainly we can conclude from this, the Guy was no wuss. At the same time, we have no record of Him punching anyone in the face or dropping kicking anyone’s family jewels, much less offing them with whatever instruments of slaughter were available at the time.
Yet seeing some big hairy brutes coming at you with massive hammers and nails the size of a jack handle is definitely going to push some buttons. If He had anything resembling a fight-or-flight reflex, it’s not unreasonable to assume that had a handgun been available, He would have emptied a few rounds into his beefy assailants and made for the hills.
What kind of weapons would Our Savior have been packing, assuming all options were on the table? Hard to say with any certainty. But He wasn’t much for mincing words. So it seems reasonable to assume He would not have made some lame choice when it came to arming Himself. I’m no expert so I’m just guessing here. But I surmise He would have had the nice and punchy Sig Sauer P228 within easy reach __ strapped to His thigh under His robes __ and had a kick-ass semi-automatic assault weapon slung over His shoulder. This would have given Him both the solace of being able to mount a quick response and the necessary firepower in case He needed to spray some serious lead around.
What kind of assault weapon would have been the Savior of Mankind’s first choice? The popularity of the Bushmaster AR-15 certainly makes it the obvious frontrunner. But I personally think he would have gone with the Israeli IMI Tavor TAR-21. After all, Jesus was a Jew and there’s got to be some basic loyalty at work. And practically speaking, the IMI Tavor TAR-21 is one sweet killing machine. It’s compact, relatively light and great at close and medium range. Those Romans getting ready to nail the Big Guy to the cross wouldn’t have stood a chance. Blam! Blam! Blam! Bye-bye, motherfuckers!
How about munitions?
Being generally disposed in His preaching to encourage His devoted flock to always show compassion, I think He would have chosen standard issue bullets and only considered using hollow-points as a last resort.
The most important thing to appreciate when thinking about Jesus Christ packing any kind of weaponry is the powerful message it sends. After all, who could possibly take seriously the word of a man who isn’t willing to stand up for what he believes in? Who won’t stand strong in the face of opposition. Who lets himself be bullied and threatened. Who isn’t man enough to look some smart aleck punk Roman soldier in the eye and say, “Make my day!”
I’m certainly not saying Jesus would have gone around and indiscriminately brandished His weapons of choice every time He got in a fix. Being the Prince of Peace, He would have been the last to lock and load. But that’s the beauty of guns. You don’t have to use them to make your point or at least to let others know you’re not going down without a fight.
What I am saying is that if Jesus had been packing that day they crucified Him, those Roman thugs would have had second thoughts about nailing Him up like a raggedy ann door prize at the county fair. He wouldn’t have died for our sins and . . .
Uh-oh.
We’d all go to Hell.
Hmm . . .
That would be bad.
In the post-election euphoria, we’ve been led to believe that President Obama’s trip to Asia is about spreading goodwill, creating new friendships, renewing old alliances, and making the world safe for democracy.
It’s a charm offensive that’s much longer on “offensive” than “charm”.
What this trip is actually about is selling TPP, the Trans-Pacific Partnership __ “selling” here being the equivalent of jamming a building the size of the New York Federal Reserve between the spread cheeks of the leaders of the countries in this part of the world.
TPP is not exactly popular even in the U.S. In fact, the more people learn about it, the more they realize that it’s a Trojan Horse, another so-called trade agreement, which in point of fact mitigates the effectiveness of many environmental and worker-protection laws, compromises the sovereignty of nations, and puts in place yet another powerful mechanism for the already bloated and rich transnational corporations to amass more socially unproductive profits. Encouragingly, more and more people are outraged and speaking out against it. This is predictably being countered by a public relations campaign using our public officials as spokespersons for the transnational corporate elite who are promoting this onerous, ill-conceived weapon of economic destruction.
Don’t be fooled by this self-serving and bogus propaganda.
Yesterday, for example, I read an article called Canada Sued under NAFTA for Banning Fracking which tells about an American corporation initiating a lawsuit for damages of $250,000,000. You see, if a business entity feels that the laws of a participating country interfere with their now inalienable rights to exploit that country, NAFTA sanctions “investor-to-state” litigation. In this case, Lone Pine Resources Inc. spent large sums of money securing mining permits, but Quebec Province, where the mining was to take place, later determined that exercising those rights would cause grave environmental damage. NAFTA allows U.S. and Mexican companies to sue the Canadian government if they feel they have been wronged by a government policy or action. This is saying that Lone Pine Resources had no responsibility in determining in advance the environmental impacts of its plans. It can throw money down, then if local authorities discover that their proposed mining will pollute the water, dump toxins in the soil, subject people to carcinogens and other life-threatening chemicals, Lone Pine Resources has to be compensated for their own shortsightedness and stupidity.
As the article goes on to say: “Amazingly, instead of looking for ways to scale back and eliminate the rules in our trade agreements that threaten public interest policies in favor of corporate profits, eleven countries, including the United States and Canada, are currently in the middle of negotiations to expand the NAFTA investment rules in the Trans-Pacific Partnership trade pact.”
This is madness!!
TPP is NAFTA on steroids. Yes. Anyone who has looked at this “trade agreement”, as its being misrepresented, can see it’s nothing but another monstrous assault weapon being handed to transnational corporations to bulk up their bottom line at the expense of just about everything having to do with quality of life __ safety, human rights, worker rights, sustainability, environmental protection. Please! Just read this and this and this, then do your own research. This is not a shades of gray issue. It’s black and white, folks.
Let me give a brief example from my own experience.
Japan Post is the postal service here. It is truly amazing in every respect. It’s essentially a privatized, public service institution that with scrupulous government oversight, conjoins several organizations to provide a variety of services. At Japan Post, not only can you mail letters, cards, and packages locally and internationally, but you can pay your bills with a fully-functioning cash transfer system, do banking with an ATM machine, secure an entire range of insurance (home, life, auto, accident), purchase gifts, make travel plans and purchase tickets. When I look at the shell of an institution the U.S. Postal Service has become under the relentless assault of private corporations there, it’s no contest. It’s like comparing a scrub game of neighborhood football to the Superbowl.
The Japanese are furious about TPP. Under TPP, corporations in the U.S. through legal challenges would tear Japan Post apart. They’d claim the panoply of services and the incredibly competent and efficient delivery of those services are “unfair competition”.
It’s competition alright. It actually works! It provides useful services making the lives of Japanese citizens better and more hassle-free.
This is just one small example. I’m not going to do all of the work for you. Just extrapolate from this, read the recommended articles and imagine what will happen if these countries are “persuaded” __ read that as “coerced” or “bullied” __ into this agreement. America’s military and economic power often makes such negotiations a sham. America is good at making less powerful nations an offer they can’t refuse.
For those of you who might not have heard, America is a very unpopular country in most of the world. Despite the whitewashed image which is promoted by corporate media in the U.S., anti-Americanism is exponentially on the rise. I have experienced this first hand.
People defensively suggest that I don’t love my country. This is both silly and ignorant.
I’ve always loved and always will love what America represents. I love the energy, the optimism, the whole idea of government of the people, by the people, for the people.
But TPP is not America. Corporation X and Corporation Y just because they’re registered in Delaware aren’t America. The tiny powerful coterie of wealthy elite investors and Wall Street bankers who are turning our government into a puppet show aren’t America.
You and I are America __ the people referred to in “of the people, by the people, for the people.” We are America.
And no proud, sane, decent American would get behind TPP and the expanding corporate juggernaut that’s being done in the name of proud, sane, decent Americans. Proud, sane, decent Americans believe in opportunity, justice, fairness, the “general welfare”. Proud, sane, decent Americans truly love their country, and would never put corporate profits ahead of how America is supposed to serve its citizens. Proud, sane, decent Americans don’t compromise the integrity of communities and schools to improve the bottom line. Proud, sane, decent Americans understand the hope America represents to the world. Proud, sane, decent American respect human rights and human life.
No, I don’t hate America. But a lot of people in the world do. And if TPP and similar such agreements are put in place, the worst is yet to come.
We won’t have time to spread the love.
We’ll be too busy defending ourselves from all the hate.
As you know, I live in Japan. Here’s something to think about.
INTENTIONAL HOMICIDES LAST YEAR:
USA . . . 12,996
Japan . . . 506
Gun ownership is strictly regulated in here.
It takes several years even to obtain a hunting license. Meeting someone with any type of gun, even a hunting rifle, is an extreme rarity in Japan.
Do you think the statistics are just a coincidence?
By the way, in 2010 __ the most recent year this statistic was made available __ there were 600 accidental deaths due to firearms in America.
Bang! Bang!
Military bases the U.S. currently has in the Middle East
Military bases the Middle Eastern countries have in the U.S.
Imagine how the residents of Seattle would feel about having an Iranian naval station on Vashon Island. How would people living in Columbus, OH relate to having an Israeli missile sight in the suburbs? Do you think the easy-going folks in Roanoke, VA would appreciate Saudi Arabia putting a few dozen barracks and a munitions depot on the outskirts of town? Do you think the residents of Azusa, CA might have a problem with Yemenis doing infantry training in the nearby Angeles Mountains?
Why do they hate us? They don’t. They just don’t want us there.
Period.
When remembering and honoring our brave men and women in uniform who have given their lives and continue to die in Afghanistan __ American and coalition deaths now exceed 3000 __ it is important to know what they are dying for.
For a full-size, more legible map, please click here.
Do you think the corporations who will be extracting the precious minerals, coal, gas and oil, and banks like JP Morgan Chase who are underwriting this monumental plundering, will share with the families of the deceased the gargantuan profits they will be making? Or give assistance to the tens of thousands maimed in the war or suffering PTSD?
I doubt it.
They won’t even send flowers.
Give me your tired, your poor
Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free
The wretched refuse of your teaming shore
Send these, the homeless, tempest-tossed to me
I say lift thy skirts, lo! come to my door
I embrace thee even as a common whore
‘Tis the illusion of freedom you implore?
Here you have it, seek no more
President Obama signed the National Defense Authorization Act on December 31, 2011.
Happy New Year!
What if they gave a war and everybody showed up?
Back in the 60s, there was an anti-war slogan popularized by Charlotte E. Keyes, which was then turned into a full-length film: “Suppose they gave a war and nobody came?”
Well,
I’m proposing the opposite: “What if they gave a war and everybody showed up?”
I mean everybody!
All 7+ billion of us.
First, this incomprehensibly large mob would have to see what all the fighting was about. That could take a while.
Next, they’d have to figure out who was who __ who were friends and who were enemies. Considering that there are so many similarities and differences, then similarities in the differences and differences in the similarities, that could take a really long time.
There would just be the basic survival issues. The day-to-day stuff. The meal-to-meal stuff. The where-can-I-take-a-leak stuff. That could really eat up a lot of time and energy.
There would be the inevitable I’m-away-from-home-what-the-hell temptations and opportunities, some innocent, some not. Making friends, fun and games, hooking up, random carnal pleasures. That would provide quite a bit of distraction, to put it mildly.
Think of the possibilities!
Granted, it would be a mess. Just the logistical problems, where to sleep, where to even sit down, would be daunting. It would be the mother of all get-togethers. It could be the party to end all parties.
Let’s just say for purposes of argument or amusement __ if you find this amusing, you really have a lot of time on your hands, so maybe this 7 billion person war is just your ticket __ we finally get around to some serious fighting.
7,000,000,000 people? That is a lot of hard work. Do you shoot them all? Club them to death? Hack them up with ginsu knives? Bore them to death with bad television?
Whew! Very daunting.
My guess __ and I’m definitely going out on a limb here __ is that after killing the first hundred million or so by whatever means, it would all seem pretty pointless. Or at least really really tedious. In fact, I’d venture to say that we’d get sick of it and at least for the foreseeable future, get on with the things that are much more fun (i. e. refer to above, making friends, fun and games, hooking up, random carnal pleasures).
Quite honestly, I don’t think the vast majority of us __ maybe 99.99999% __ would ever get around to fighting. We have better things to do.
So maybe the way to cure our addiction to war is when the next big conflict comes our way, we should all get out our backpacks, duffel bags, kid carriers, picnic baskets, and thermos bottles, then head en masse for the battlefield.
All 7+ billion of us!
Let’s have a real good go at this war business once and for all.
I really truly want to know . . .
What if they gave a war and everybody showed up?