Language is a funny thing. It admits for all sorts of sins. At the same time, it offers lush alternatives when making and rationalizing important decisions. Naturally, we like to hedge our bets, walk a fine line.
We always cover our asses.
At the same time . . .
Can you be just a little married?
Can you be just a little pregnant?
Can you be just a little upside-down?
Can you be just a little vaporized?
Can you be just a little raped?
Can you be just a little castrated?
Can you be just a little dead?
Can you be just a little extinct?
Can black be just a little black? If so, what’s the rest? Still black but not black?
Can white be just a little white? Is the part that’s just a little white still white?
Can a ‘yes’ be both ‘yes’ but just a little ‘no’?
Can a ‘no’ be both ‘no’ but just a little ‘yes’?
Despite the headache you might now be experiencing, often there’s more at stake. Every game is a thing but not everything is a game.
In these instances we need to be a little more precise . . .
Is war inevitable?
Is war good or bad?
Does might make right?
Are all humans created equal?
Is good health a basic human right?
Are food and water basic human rights?
Does a woman have the same rights as a man?
Can an individual be owned by another individual?
Do property rights take precedence over human rights?
Can any man claim life or death authority over another man?
Does the law of a higher power take precedence over human law?
When a person surrenders autonomy to the state, can he take it back?
Is freedom a natural and absolute fact or an artificial and relative artifact?
Are citizens answerable to governments or governments answerable to citizens?
How about this? . . .
Can humankind survive if there’s a limited nuclear war?
Assuming we’re in favor of the survival of the human species . . .
How much nuclear war is just the right amount?
Humans are very smart creatures. We know this from hearing ourselves say it all the time.
Now to figure out how much nuclear war the “good guys” should inflict on the “bad guys”, factoring in the carnage that will inevitably be experienced by a number of people who don’t precisely fit in either the ‘good guy’ camp or the ‘bad guy’ camp — these indeterminate types are sometimes called ‘collateral damage’ or more descriptively ‘innocent victims’ — using cost/benefit analysis and predictive models, we can fairly accurately determine exactly what level of nuclear war, rationally looking at the big picture, is most efficacious and laudable.
You know . . . strike the right balance.
Fine tune it. Don’t go overboard.
Just a little . . . nuclear war.
Is my sarcasm showing?
It’s easy to scoff at my asking questions like these, then commending them as some sort of pseudo-philosophical exploration. You might judge this as a thinly-disguised exercise in self-promotion, an attempt to portray myself as some deep thinker. You might feel my frustration and empathize with my isolation and relative impotence, yet still dismiss all of this as the nonsensical ruminations of a confused and deluded quasi-intellectual — a Jean Paul Sartre wannabe.
You might have decided that this whole business of blogging is an unflattering display of infantile neediness; that indeed the urgent, aching lust for attention, which has lingered on from early childhood, being nettlesome and obnoxious even back then, but now ill-advised at best and loathsome at worst — I’m not sure I can put up much of a defense against any of these insinuations — is either pathetic or pathological, perhaps both, in spite of being the defining feature in our selfie-driven, “it’s all about me” contemporary times.
Or more innocently . . .
You may think that I have way too much time on my hands.
Frankly, I think time is running out.
Granted, some of the above are mental exercises.
But others are arguably very important questions.
Existential questions!
Am I so off-base?
We need answers!
Do you have time?
Just a little?
Kingda Ka, oh baby!
I love my wife’s perspective on America.
She recently drew my attention to Kingda Ka, one of the world’s fastest and probably most frightening roller coasters. It whips riders straight up, then plunges them straight down, in a shrieking, brain-compressing drop of 418 feet. Maximum speed? 128 MPH! You can see from the POV YouTube video at the end of this posting, this ride is most definitely not for the faint-of-heart.
Kingda Ka is one of the main attractions at Six Flags Great Adventure in Jackson, NJ and has no shortage of takers. These would be the same people who like base-jumping from the Eiffel Tower and bobbing for apples in a wingsuit in the jet wash of a 747.
Back to Masumi, my brilliant Japanese wife.
Her take on this? Well, after I watched the video and read about this spectacular display of American ingenuity — an astonishing engineering achievement by any measure — she smiled and said:
“So . . . America can build a high-speed jet coaster [ roller coasters are called jet coasters here ] but they can’t build a high-speed train?”
Now, this was not America-bashing. Masumi has no particular problem with America — that is, other than a couple of atomic bombs in 1945 and all of the raping and murders that go on in Okinawa because of the U.S. military base there. Despite these minor caveats, she has no repressed antipathy toward America.
It was just a comment, an expression of astonishment at the incongruity of it all, as in: “You can send a man to the moon but you don’t have any way of sewing buttons on a shirt?”
Maybe this comes as a shock to most Americans: But trains as a form of transportation are completely taken for granted in most of the industrialized world. China, Italy, Great Britain, Switzerland, Austria, France, even South Africa, India, Malaysia, and Thailand, and of course Japan, are just some of the countries where I have personally used trains to get around. In most places, trains are like flush toilets, running water, electricity, roads, and now WiFi. They are a standard component of everyday life, just like cars in the U.S. You want to go somewhere? You take a train. Every day around 7:30 am, the trains here are full of kids on their way to school and businessmen on their way to work.
Beyond regular train service, high-speed trains — high-speed is considered being able to sustain a speed of 200 MPH, though many go much faster — are, among other places, up and running in China, Spain, here in Japan, France, Sweden, Turkey, the United Kingdom, Germany, Italy, South Korea, Russia, Finland, and even Uzbekistan. China leads the world with almost 12,000 miles of high-speed rail, Spain is second with over 1,900 miles, and Japan is third with over 1,650 miles.
To give you some perspective on the marvels and flexibility of travel by train just about everywhere in the civilized world: I live way out in the country, in a small, traditional, rural farming community. But if I want a mega-dose of big city life, I can leave in the morning, take a regular, then a high-speed train (called the Shinkansen) to Tokyo, go practically anywhere in the most populous city in the world by using the incredible subway system there, and be back here in my home town before sun down. Note that I live almost 400 miles from Tokyo! But using only my bicycle to get to the train station, I could have lunch in Tokyo and be back home in plenty of time for dinner. No car! No driving! I could read a book or work on my next novel on my way there and back.
Yes, this is pretty standard fare. In Europe and Asia, everything is connected. All of the airports, both domestic and international, the trains, the subways, and the buses, are all engineered in vast intertwined and layered matrices to make transportation the least of anyone’s worries.
If you want to get technical about it, Masumi is not entirely correct. The U.S. does have one high-speed corridor. It is part of the Acela Express service between Washington DC and Boston. It’s a 17 mile-long stretch where “theoretically” the train could reach the 200 MPH qualifying speed. But the entire run is on rickety old regular railroad tracks and the train makes so many stops, the average speed for the trip is only around 65 MPH. Good grief! The normal everyday trains here in Japan go faster than that!
As if the U.S. were not already dismally behind just about every other advanced country — and some not so advanced — get this: China and Russia are in the process of developing something called hyperloop technology, a system using magnetically-suspended pods to transport people and products across the expanses of their vast countries at — are you ready for this? — up to 750 MPH! Seat belts are recommended.
“So America can build a high-speed jet coaster but they can’t build a high-speed train?”
Actually, it could. It just doesn’t.
Until you can visit Six Flags Great Adventure personally, I’ll just leave you with the next best thing.