The U.S. State Department has accused Russia of hacking into the ionosphere and generating excessive and annoying levels of Northern Lights. The ongoing display of light saber rattling, apparently a misguided attempt to “show off” the technological prowess of their teams of warmongering physicists, extends its “tentacles of terror” deep into the sovereign territory of the U.S. and its European allies. This has resulted in widespread panic in U.S. cities like Buffalo, NY and Detroit, MI, where public displays of drunkenness and rowdiness have skyrocketed.
While no evidence of Russian responsibility has been offered, White House spokesperson, Josh Earnest, recently stated: “The motive is obvious. The constant flashing and gyrating shapes in the sky are intended to cause sleep deprivation. When people don’t get enough sleep, their guard is down. The Russians are trying to undermine our national security with this cheap stunt. It’s an unprecedented act of aggression and, trust me, will not go unanswered. We are coordinating our response with the Department of Defense, NSA, CIA, and Hayden Planetarium in New York.”
One reporter asked about the rumors that world-renowned astrophysicist Dr. Neal deGrasse Tyson had been summoned to the White House to seek his expert advice on exactly what appropriate counter-measures and retaliation might be available.
“Well . . . Mr. Tyson appears to be a Putin-apologist and commie sympathizer. When we approached him about this, after he stopped rudely laughing in our faces, the guy just shrugged his shoulders and walked away shaking his head. What an arrogant man. We are keeping our eye on him.”
U.S. Ambassador to the UN, Samantha Power, has just presented American demands to the United Nations Security Council that a comprehensive regime of economic sanctions be imposed on Russia for tampering with the electromagnetic field of the Earth.
“We need to show these Russians once and for all we mean business. Today it’s Northern Lights. Tomorrow they’ll be injecting vodka into the aquifers serving the citizens of the free world, or blasting balalaika music at us 24/7 from outer space. This is an outrage and an act of war. As humanitarians concerned with the welfare of people everywhere on this planet, it is our duty to support the Russian citizenry as they attempt to free themselves from the barbaric oppression and inhumane cruelty of government tyranny, by cutting off all food, water, medicine, electricity, and internet access. Let these sanctions do their job. Pass this resolution immediately!”
In a separate interview, another reporter asked Secretary of Defense Ashton Carter, what will America do if the sanctions don’t work.
“We have a Plan B. If sanctions don’t break the chains of totalitarian control which Putin is attempting to impose on the world, perhaps a few thousand cruise missiles will.”
So . . .
Rest assured, folks, our enlightened leadership has the situation under control. America will in the end triumph.
But just to be safe . . .
While there is no medical evidence that Northern Lights per se can cause physiological damage, the FDA has just recommended that until this siege is brought under control, everyone should stay indoors and keep their blinds and curtains drawn.
Should you have to go out at night, apply SPF-50 sun block to exposed areas and wear sunglasses. DO NOT STARE AT THE LIGHTS! It is unlikely but still possible that they contain subliminal “brainwashing” messages. If you are bothered by the unusual urge to read Das Kapital by Karl Marx, or seized by the impulse to stand on a table and break out singing The Internationale, immediately see a doctor. This is covered under Obamacare.
A Look At Some Other Numbers
On July 20th, I
created The “I’ll vote for Jill if you will” Pledge Campaign. This included setting up petitions at four reputable petition campaign sites to keep track of the number of participants. Off to an encouraging start, I got signatures on the very first day.
This whole effort addresses what I consider to be the primary obstacle to Jill Stein getting elected. That is, it offers a mechanism to work around the predictable fears that most voters have that if they vote third-party, they will “throw their vote away” and even worse, end up electing one of the major party candidates who they abhor. Those who voted for Ralph Nader — I was one of them — were wrongly accused of throwing the election to George W. Bush. Though this is easily established as false, the idea of the “spoiler vote” continues to persist and serve the agenda of the two-party monopoly, preventing any real challenge from either the progressive left, the libertarian right, or any party for that matter functioning outside the narrow, tightly choreographed corporate mainstream.
The success of my campaign to unite potential Jill Stein voters into a bloc, essentially by “pre-polling” the voting public, was predicated on ascertaining in advance that there were sufficient voters to elect her. Ascertaining that meant voters could comfortably vote for her without fear of wasting their votes, perhaps inadvertently electing Donald or Hillary, whichever might be judged worse — though in my book it’s a toss-up.
The target was 50 million or more voter signatures, which I determined would be enough, if distributed appropriately in important swing states, to put her in the White House.
The key to getting that many signatures was the power of an exponential multiplier, or as I euphemistically dubbed it, the power of numbers. If each person who signed the petition — and in doing so agreed to participate in the program — told only two others, instructing them to each likewise tell two others, in less than 30 days we could have over 67 million people signed up, more than enough to eradicate all anxiety about voting for Jill Stein.
So how did we do?
On September 9th, we finally hit 5,000 signatures across all four petition sites.
That is, we managed to get 5,000 well-meaning folks — and judging from the comments very passionate supporters of Jill Stein — to jump on board, and it only took 52 days.
Mind you, I didn’t just sit back and twiddle my thumbs. In fact from the day I started the campaign till now, I’ve sent out over a thousand tweets, posted it on over ninety Facebook pages, posted it as comments on some fifty plus political media sites, posted it on Google+, Pinterest, LinkedIn, Tumblr, Stumbleupon, Reddit, Blogger, Delicious, and Live Journal.
Which suggests that assuming I don’t suffer from dwindling returns for my effort — highly doubtful since the “low-hanging fruit” gets used up quickly — in order to get to 50 million signature, I would only need to keep doing what I’ve been doing for the next 1,424 years.
What do you think? Should I keep going?
Alright . . . what happened?
That is perhaps the easiest question in the world.
People didn’t recruit anyone else. Despite their personal enthusiasm for Jill Stein, despite many of them — judging from the enthusiastic praise I got for the idea — thinking it was a highly ingenious way to make her a viable candidate in the eyes of a fearful voting public, despite them making a firm pledge when they signed the petition which committed them to the action which was the critical core of the strategy . . .
“I will now contact two other people who I respect and trust, let them know there is a real alternative to the Clinton vs. Trump political spectacle, explain that if we frustrated voters join together, we don’t have to throw our votes away, we can elect a great president, America’s first female president no less.”
. . . they just couldn’t bring themselves to talk to and convince others that this was a necessary and worthwhile project.
Am I surprised? Of course not. Disappointed but not surprised.
As citizens we have become paralyzed by our own timidity and fear of failure, intimidated and rendered dysfunctional by the dysfunction all around us. We’ve become disengaged and numb from the constant trumpeting of counter-productive memes, false narratives, the insultingly banal media coverage of politics, the disinformation and propaganda that bombards us 24/7/365. We have been made cynical and immersed in despair by endless violations of the public trust by our leaders, by the condescending and cavalier lies we are constantly told by our politicians and other puppet-masters in the pulpits of power. Most tragically, we have become afraid, afraid of the police, afraid of the government, afraid of one another, afraid to act. We’re just too afraid to turn to a couple other people and say: “Hey, look at this. I think it’s a great idea!”
But here is the problem . . .
No matter how hopeless and difficult it seems, we must act. We must get involved. Time is running out on democracy. There still remains some small hope that we as citizens can make a difference. But that hope is shrinking fast.
What probably the majority of citizens apparently fail to understand — or if possible avoid thinking about — is that in our current social and political environment, under the “rules of the game”, we have no choice but to participate. Just being a citizen means you are intrinsically a functional “activist” in a system which determines everything that is happening now and will happen in the future.
There is widespread reluctance to recognize and embrace a simple fact: The future is still ours for the taking.
The numbers are with us across the board — on many key issues, on outrage and contempt for Congress, on collective revulsion for the choice we are being waterboarded with via the two major party presidential candidates.
What is lacking?
Courage. The courage to just reach out to others and say:
“I’ve had it! I’m not playing this game anymore.”
Yes, many are saying this but only to themselves. Until the American public hears a loud roar and a thunderous chant, and each and all realize they are not alone, they individually will again buckle to their fear, and be afraid of a simple act like reaching out to just two others — even two others of like mind and thinking — and talking, just being open and honest about issues that confront all of us but from which we retreat like cowards.
Recognize this . . .
Being paralyzed by fear and hopelessness is a form of “citizen participation”.
As is surrender or any other form of capitulation or acknowledging defeat.
It’s self-sabotaging but participation no less.
To not act is counter-intuitively an act.
Because to not act is a choice.
And all choices have their consequences.
We will live or die by what those consequences look like.